For years I was disturbed the the lack of content in student analysis of literature. Our English elective curriculum at Scotland High School in Laurinburg, North Carolina, included a one-semester course called "Writing About Literature." Its purpose was to prepare seniors, most of whom had already been accepted into a four-year academic college or university, to write an acceptable version of the "500-word" theme, because it was so often the major assignment of college freshman composition classes.
Teaching the form was not difficult. Bright adolescents could imitate a pattern and quickly learn to include an introductory paragraph, a clearly stated thesis, documentation of that thesis, and a conclusion. With guidance and careful editing, they learned to avoid major grammatical errors and awkward sentence patterns. However, their attempts usually lacked an "authentic voice," and were frequently as dull as dish water. Student content lacked conviction and style. Meaningless repetition was often their chosen technique to reach the required 500 words.
After grading a particularly disappointing set of themes, I decided that the fault lay in my teaching more than in my students. I dreaded reading their themes even after a stimulating study of Shakespeare's Macbeth, a favorite piece of literature. My students enjoyed the play. Certainly the witches's scene appealed to them, and they spontaneously applauded my sleepwalking scene. I was pleased with their scores on the standardized objective test given to all classes studying Shakespeare -- but I dreaded grading their themes on character analysis. I feared that most of their compositions would seem to be "tales told by an idiot...signifying nothing."
How could I encourage originality, critical thinking, and style?
These same students had written quite interesting personal autobiographical compositions in Theme Writing a year earlier. Perhaps their problem was that we teachers of Advanced Composition (Writing About Literature) were driving a wedge between the writer and his work by emphasizing form to the exclusion of personal reaction. We were stifling that "authentic voice." We demanded:
- the third person instead of the first,
- a clearly stated -- almost sterile -- thesis statement indicating three points to develop,
- direction quotations from the selection to document that thesis
- reinforcement (translated by students as reiteration) in the conclusion
- the use of the literary present
- a well-developed opening paragraph proceeding from the general to the specific, ad infinitum.
No wonder that our students were concentrating so hard on the way to write this magic "approximately 500-word" paper that they had lost all spontaneity or personal feelings about selections that they had thoroughly enjoyed reading and discussing.
Could English teachers help students develop an acceptable form for writing literary criticism and still encourage them in self-expression, perceptivity, and sincerity?
They had learned the form to please us and to earn acceptable grades; they seemed indifferent to content. Perhaps if we were as enthusiastic about ideas as we had been intent on organization, they would "learn by contagion," a phrase I picked up from Dr. James Britton of London when attending an Institute for English teachers at New York University.
I decided that, like my younger students who were engrossed in personal narratives and descriptions, these adolescents could also benefit from the journal approach.
Hereafter, my classes would react to the selections under consideration in their journals before even considering analysis. Encouraging students to respond honestly and concretely to short fiction would help uncover their authentic voice.
By allowing literature to evoke memories of their own experiences, students began to "feel" their interpretations of stories, and their writing developed an extra quality that might be called style. I like to think of it as their lost authentic voice....
Since taking this approach to teaching, I have seen my students earn grades of A and B in contrast to the ubiquitous C's of their predecessors. I'm not offering a magic formula for teaching writing, but can from my own experience highly recommend the personal approach. When students understand that the "authentic voice" means that an audience is ready to listen to their views and to be impressed by their style, they are motivated to perform well. -- From "The Teaching of Writing" by Lillian S. Buie, Carlton Press, Inc, New York, 1983.
Recent Comments